STRATEGI BREAKOUT BASELINE( BOBase ) siri 1
Updated: Feb 12, 2022
Ramai trader yang menggunakan teknik Breakout Strategy dalam trading khususnya short-term trader. Teknik ini adalah berbeza daripada Buy On Breakout (BOB) iaitu berada dalam posisi semasa breakout sedang berlaku ( first attemp ). Teknik BOB memerlukan analisis yang mendalam dan multi-alat teknikal untuk justifikasikan strategi BOB sama ada berkesan atau sebaliknya. Maksudnya risiko BOB adalah tinggi sekiranya berlaku FALSE/FAKE breakout.
Oleh kerana itulah, kami syorkan anda untuk menggunakan teknik Breakout On Baseline (BOBase) yang lebih selamat dan mengurangkan risiko. Teknik ini hanya menggunakan alat teknikal yang minima iaitu 3 indikator sahaja iaitu Moving Average, Stosh-RSI dan BollingerBand. Siri ini merupakan siri asas terlebih dahulu iaitu bagaimana BOBase di aplikasikan dalam dagangan.
Carta di atas di atas menunjukkan bagaimana posisi BOBase dilakukan dimana ketika pasaran dalam keadaan uptrend. Apabila harga telah memecahkan garisan resistance( garisan horizontal) , kebiasaannya harga akan retrace/pullback atau turun seketika. Maka di sinilah kita mengawasi harga di kawasan pullback atau support area( Resistance become support) dimana harga resistance breakout sebelum ini menjadi support sekarang. Petak kuning ialah kawasan support yang baru. Kawasan ini juga merupakan kawasan entry yang terbaik kerana harga akan melambung semula selepas membuat pembetulan seketika dalam keadaan uptrend.
Lihat carta di atas, kami mengaplikasikan teknik ini dan memperoleh 8% gains dalam 2 hari dagangan. Entry selepas breakout pada harga support iaitu 0.340 dan exit pada 0.370. Anda hanya trade 1 atau 2 kali sahaja untuk memperoleh 8%-10% dalam tempoh 7 hari dagangan. Anggaran ini merujuk kepada anggaran bilangan hari pullback selepas breakout.
Siri ini akan bersambung dalam entry akan datang dengan penerangan jenis breakout dan teknikal asas indikator yang digunakan.
Selamat berdagang...SMART,DISIPLIN dan SUCCESS...
The subject of exploring learning through shared interests feels more interesting when there is room for a reader to stop and ask their own questions. A shared interest can give a group a reason to exchange explanations and examples. Seen this way, collaborative learning interests becomes a topic to explore rather than something to sum up too quickly. The part I would like to explore further is what happens when the idea meets a real situation with its own limitations. How can a learning group welcome beginners alongside more experienced participants?
I find planning an academic writing project easier to think about when there is a concrete question to start from. A clear outline can reveal gaps before a writer invests time in full paragraphs. That connection helps me see why academic writing planning can be worth a closer look. I would probably come back to this question after trying to work through one concrete example rather than deciding immediately. How do you decide whether a section supports the main question or merely adds background?
My first thought about developing confidence in language practice is that the everyday experience deserves as much attention as the larger explanation. A low-pressure conversation can help a learner use words they recognise but rarely say aloud. This is why I would approach language practice confidence with a specific question rather than a fixed expectation. I do not have a settled view yet, but this seems like a good place to slow down and look more closely. Which activities encourage speaking without making every mistake feel important?
When it comes to supporting teachers through shared learning resources, I would rather understand one useful detail properly than rush through a long list of ideas. A resource becomes more useful when it includes enough context for another teacher to adapt it. That is the kind of detail I would keep in mind while exploring teacher learning resources. I am more curious about the process than a polished result, because the steps in between are usually where questions appear. What information would you include when sharing an activity that worked in your classroom?
There is something approachable about discussing turning curiosity into deeper understanding through situations people can actually picture. A good follow-up question can turn a quick fact into something worth exploring. It also gives the phrase curiosity and knowledge a clearer meaning than a label on its own. I am still thinking through the details, and a small example would help me picture how this works in practice. How do you decide which question to investigate after an initial explanation?